There are reports which appear very frequently in the newspapers, about receiving medical advice on the net. One recent newspaper article gave statistics about how accurate one particular website was in predicting the diagnosis. There are many websites which purportedly ‘treat’ the patient. My own relatives have come to me after taking ‘advice’ from these websites. Off course, it’s a wonderful thing if people find information about their disease conditions and learn more about it, but at the same time people are often misled by the ads or sometimes are even carried away with the information. So I thought I should try and explain how and when internet references may be helpful for an individual.
I myself went through some searches on the net and found that all the websites I referred take extreme caution in making the reader understand that the website in particular is not a substitute for a doctor. They are only to be used as supplements for the advice from a doctor/physician. Some of the sites even ask the reader to go through only such references recommended by his/her physician. They also make it clear that they offer no treatment but they only provide information which may help in understanding the disease condition in a better way. The drugs which are very often ‘prescribed’ are non-prescription drugs which can be bought over the counter. Non –prescription drugs are advised as readily as they have lesser side effects, but the point to be noted here is that they have side effects.
OK fine, websites have to be used only as information portals and not as treatment options, so why is this confusion created if you search for such references?
Obviously, there is a huge load of medical info on the net and trying to access the net for a piece of information may mislead anybody. So how and where do you search for the info? If the info is found, is it the same info which we had wanted? How does one confirm the reliability of the information? The questions may seem very simple, basic and uncomplicated, which they may be, but the answers are absolutely not!
Before we try to untangle the answers to the questions I again make a request to discuss the doubts among the doctor concerned. The web references should only be consulted on the advice of your physician/doctor. On consulting the web pages do not try to glean inferences directly or come to any conclusions without professional help. Well I’m hoping I’m not scaring you guys, I just want to make things clear as I feel this is very important.
As for finding info on the web, the first thing to do is of course Google the specific information required. If you have access to the net through any of the digital libraries or universities it would be ideal as more relevant info can be collected easily as they usually have accesses to journals and publications which are otherwise difficult to enter into. Go through the Google references one by one and select the articles on preference which are from an official website of an Institute/University or the government. Examples for such institutes could be the National Institutes of Health or Centres for Disease Control and Prevention or websites belonging to the government of India. Find out when this particular article was edited as older articles are not very relevant in this fast changing medical age. Small publications/websites may not be believable as the information may not be discussed elaborately. See if you can find articles which have many authors who belong to that particular field only. Find for articles which encourage you to find/interpret the answers rather than which say or mean ‘this is the only answer’ or ‘we are absolutely right’. Publications are more reliable if they have some negatives in them, which tell where they were wrong and which needed to be corrected later on by a second group or individual/s. If you are a professional and want articles for your reference or to quote somewhere look for articles which are ‘peer reviewed’. Articles are better rated if the information is relevant to your specific region, age or sex. I mean the publications are good if they specify region, age or sex related changes. As in any publications articles are good if they do not have spelling mistakes or grammar mistakes. This shows that the articles have been closely reviewed or re-written for the benefit of the reader. If you find articles which have statistics and graphs, they should be good as they make the reader understand things more easily. It is better to read full-text articles than just abstracts, as abstracts may mislead you without the full info.
Do not search for medical info on the web in an emergency other than for contact info. Always get professional help in emergencies.
Of course these are only some basic guidelines. It is very much subjective what the individual reader prefers. Even with all this knowledge some people may not find what they had wanted. If you can’t find the relevant info or if you are not satisfied with what you have found out, try again another time or another day with a fresh mind. It only takes a bit of intelligence and a lot of patience to search for medical info on the web.
I would like to know by my medical and non-medical reader friends what kind of medical info they refer/search on the net and how they do it. It would help all of us to share some knowledge. Hope this blog will serve a good purpose.
Article is relevant in the present context/world where more and more people hog on to net for each and everything.
ReplyDeleteYour use of simple language to explain medical (technical) stuff to make all understand, serves the purpose.
Thanks for very informative blog !
ReplyDeleteI think the medical information on web should be used to know how to prevent any disease rather than using it for cure.
Article is explains present scenario, as the net is available with all kind of info, it reminds me one of the pt having AVN femoral head , who went through the web, gathered all information including from the international journal,
ReplyDeleteYour guidelines on using the web for getting the basic information on illnesses by intelligent lay persons is very helpful.
ReplyDeleteThe difficulty, however, is for less well informed people to get reliable information.
As all responsible web sites underline, information on their website is no substitute for a qualified and experienced physician. Hope people who search the internet for medical knowledge keep this in mind.
In a poor country like ours, it is better for poor people to come directly to a doctor instead of going to a website and getting either confused, or more dangerously, misled.
I use several well-known health websites to find out more about the symptoms I have or my family members have. I always see a doctor before doing anything based upon information on a website. In fact, the information on the website enables me to speak to my doctor candidly and respectfully.
Your guarded cautionary tale on using the internet for medical information is a good antidote to the popular belief on using the internet.
Thanks Raghu, Sudhi, Shridhar and Narasim for your comments.
ReplyDelete@Sudhi- Yes, it's better to use the net for prevention rather than cure.
@ Narasim- this article was written after those discussions I had on the topic with you, from which I picked up some points for this blog!. I'm hoping you will not sue me! As usual, you give the take home points in a simple way. Thanks for all that.
Thank you Dathathri for your very very valuable comment. I’m really happy seeing your comment here. I’m happy not just for the comment but also for the info you, as an experienced medical professional, have provided on how, where and for what kind of info a professional searches for on the net. The web links you have suggested here are wonderful sites for medical professionals. As per your advice I have registered myself in them. Thanks again for sharing the links.
ReplyDeleteI would like to see more such comments from my dear friends who are professionally equivalents.